Gatenby Law
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • Our Team
    • Our Services
    • Media
    • Work with Us?
  • The Law
    • Drug Offences
    • Criminal Law
      • Assault Offences
      • Property Offences
      • Breach Offences
      • Dishonesty Offences
      • Prostitution Offences
      • Public Order Offences
      • Sexual Offences
      • OMCG and Serious Crime Offences
      • White Collar Offences
    • Traffic Offences
      • Dangerous Driving
      • Careless Driving
      • Disqualified Driving
      • Drink Driving
      • Drug Driving – Driving while relevant drug is present
      • Drug Driving – Drive under the influence of a drug
      • Speeding
      • Unlicensed Driving
      • Hooning Laws
      • Street Racing
    • Licence Applications
      • Work Licence Application
      • Removal of Licence Disqualification
      • Immediate Licence Suspension
      • Special Hardship Order
    • Domestic Violence
    • Police Interviews
    • Bail Applications
  • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Guides
    • Publications
    • Queensland Police Stations – Contact Details
    • Criminal Convictions
      • Can I ask a Queensland Court for ‘no conviction recorded’?
      • Criminal Record, Recorded Convictions and your rights.
      • Disclosure of ‘no conviction recorded’
      • Applying for a Blue Card with a Criminal Conviction.
  • FAQ’S
    • Costs / Fees
    • Courts We Attend
  • GCL Blog
  • Pages
    • Pages

      • #4233 (no title)
      • 404
      • About
      • About Gatenby Lawyers
        • Michael Gatenby
        • Work with Us?
      • Alcohol interlock devices
      • Applying for a Blue Card with a Criminal Conviction.
      • Articles & Media
      • Ashleigh Smith
      • Breach of Bail
      • Bree Clarke
      • Brisbane Courts
      • Can I ask a Queensland Court for ‘no conviction recorded’?
      • Character Reference Guidelines – District Court
      • Character Reference Guidelines – Supreme Court
      • CHARACTER REFERENCE GUIDELINES- MAGISTRATES COURT
      • Community Based Orders
      • Community Service – Requirements of Order
      • Consorting – Relevant Offence Definitions
      • Contact Us
      • Contact Us
      • Contact Us / Criminal and Traffic Law Experts
        • Criminal Lawyers Gold Coast
      • Courts We Attend
      • Criminal Convictions
      • Criminal Law – Affray
      • Criminal Law – Aiding Suicide
      • Criminal Law – Assaults Occasioning Bodily Harm
      • Criminal Law – Common Assault
      • Criminal Law – Grievous Bodily Harm
      • Criminal Law – Malicious Acts
      • Criminal Law – Serious Assault
      • Criminal Law Services
        • Bail Applications
        • Criminal Law
          • Assault
          • Breach Offences
          • Dishonesty Offences
          • Property Offences
          • Prostitution Offences
          • Public Order Offences
          • Sexual Offences
          • White Collar Offences
        • Domestic Violence
        • Forms
        • Licence Applications
          • Immediate Licence Suspension
          • Removal of Licence Disqualification
          • Special Hardship Order
        • Police Interviews
        • Traffic Offences
          • Careless Driving
          • Dangerous Driving
          • Disqualified Driving
          • Drink Driving
          • Drug Driving – Drive under the influence of a drug
          • Drug Driving – Driving while relevant drug is present
          • Hooning Laws
          • Speeding
          • Street Racing
          • Unlicensed Driving
          • Work Licence Application
      • Criminal Record, Recorded Convictions and your rights.
      • Demi Quadrio
      • Disclosure of ‘no conviction recorded’
      • Dishonesty Offences – Bringing Stolen Goods into Queensland
      • Dishonesty Offences – Computer Hacking and Misuse
      • Dishonesty Offences – Dealing with Identification Information
      • Dishonesty Offences – Demanding Property with Menaces to Steal
      • Dishonesty Offences – Extortion
      • Dishonesty Offences – Fraud
      • Dishonesty Offences – Money Laundering
      • Dishonesty Offences – Petrol Drive Off
      • Dishonesty Offences – Possess Property Suspected of Being Tainted Property
      • Dishonesty Offences – Receiving Tainted Property
      • Dishonesty Offences – Robbery
      • Dishonesty Offences – Stealing
      • Dishonesty Offences – Stealing as a servant
      • Dishonesty Offences – Unauthorised Dealing with Shop Goods (UTAG)
      • Do I Need A Lawyer?
      • Drug Charges – Permitting Use of Place
      • Drug Charges – Possessing Dangerous Drugs
      • Drug Charges – Possessing Things
      • Drug Charges – Produce Dangerous Drugs
      • Drug Charges – Supplying Dangerous Drugs
      • Drug Charges – Trafficking in Dangerous Drugs
      • Drug Offences
      • EXPERT TRAFFIC LAW ADVICE – (07)55800 120
      • FAQ’S
        • Costs / Fees
        • Forms
      • Fixed Fees
      • Glossary
      • Guides
      • Home
      • Home Page
      • Legal Aid
      • Make an enquiry
      • Media
      • New Client
      • News
      • Offender Levy
      • OMCG and Serious Crime Offences
      • OMCG Laws – Contravene Order to Access Information
      • OMCG Laws – Contravene Public Safety Order
      • OMCG Laws – Contravening Restricted Premises Order
      • OMCG Laws – Habitually Consorting
      • OMCG Laws – Hindering Removal of Fortification Order
      • OMCG Laws – Recruiting person to become member of a criminal organisation
      • Our Firm
      • Our Offices
      • Our Services
      • Our Team
      • Patricija Nedeljko
      • Police Interviews
      • Police Stations We Attend
      • Possess Unregistered Firearms
      • Preparing For Your First Appointment?
      • PROBATION – REQUIREMENTS OF ORDER
      • Property Offences – Arson
      • Property Offences – Break and Enter
      • Property Offences – Burglary
      • Property Offences – Possess Implements of Housebreaking
      • Property Offences – Trespass
      • Property Offences – Unlawful Entry of a Dwelling
      • Property Offences – Unlawful Entry of Motor Vehicle
      • Property Offences – Unlawful Use of a Motor Vehicle
      • Property Offences – Wilful Damage
      • Publications
      • Qld Drug Offences
      • Qld Drug Offences Copy
      • Qld Weapons Offences
      • Queensland Police Stations – Contact Details
      • Services
      • Testimonials
      • Testimonials-01
      • Testimonials-02
      • Weapon Categories
      • What Court Will I Go To?
      • White Collar Offences – Corporate Fraud
Mandatory Penalties
August 18, 2020

Possession of a Weapon in a Public Place – Mandatory minimum penalties.

M. T. Gatenby Cases, Laws, Penalties, Uncategorized

On 30 April 2012, the then Premier of Queensland, Campbell Newman revealed a crack down on weapons offences. His government introduced mandatory minimum penalties for weapons charges.  Importantly section 50 of the Weapons Act 1990 was amended to include mandatory minimum sentences for possession of various classes of weapons in a public place. Consequently this regime has seen sentences which have appeared unjust. Queensland Courts have sought to remedy the unfairness by imposing probation orders, particularly for young, first time offenders.

There have been conflicting interpretations in both the Magistrates and District Court on this issue. That is to say, does the Court have a power in an appropriate case, to impose a period of probation instead of the actual imprisonment. The Court of Appeal has now determined the issue of Mandatory Minimum Imprisonment for possession of weapon charges in the decision of Commissioner of Police v Broederlow [2020] QCA 161

The legislation provides at Section 50(1)(d) under the heading minimum penalty:

  1. if the person unlawfully possesses a firearm and uses the firearm to commit an indictable offence—18 months imprisonment served wholly in a corrective services facility; or 
  2. if the person unlawfully possesses a firearm for the purpose of committing or facilitating the commission of an indictable offence—1 year’s imprisonment served wholly in a corrective services facility; or 
  3. if the person unlawfully possesses a short firearm in a public place without a reasonable excuse—1 year’s imprisonment served wholly in a corrective services facility; or

The mandatory minimum penalty provisions in s 50 were introduced at the same time as those for unlawful supply in s 50B and for unlawful trafficking in s 65. That occurred in 2012, with the passing of the Weapons and Other Legislation Amendment Act. After that legislation was passed there has been ongoing tension between the language of the section and general sentencing discretion.

Facts

On 22 December 2018, Ethan Broederlow was intercepted by police while driving a vehicle. As a result he revealed that he had a gun in the vehicle and police discovered upon searching that the gun was a silver homemade single shot pistol. The pistol had a bolt action and was designed to fire a .22 calibre bullet. Broederlow did not have a weapons licence authorising him to possess such a firearm. As a result he was charged with unlawful possession of a weapon in public, contrary to s 50 of the Weapons Act 1990 (Qld).

Magistrates Court Sentence

On 10 April 2019, Mr Broederlow pleaded guilty to possessing the weapon and 12 other charges, in the Beenleigh Magistrates Court . The sentencing magistrate concluded that he was required to impose a mandatory minimum sentence of one year’s imprisonment served wholly in a corrective services facility. This was because of the application of s 50(1)(d)(iii) of the Weapons Act.

District Court Appeal

Broederlow appealed against his sentence to the District Court, contending that the Magistrate erred in finding that probation was not an available sentencing option. In essence the Magistrate was wrong to consider himself constrained as to his sentencing discretion.

Judge Chowdrey heard the appel. His Honour, allowed the appeal and resentenced Broederlow to a period of two years’ probation with a conviction recorded. See decision of Chowdhury DCJ in Broederlow v Commissioner of Police (No 2) [2019] QDC 241

Ground of Appeal

The Commissioner of Police appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal pursuant to s 118(3) of the District Court of Queensland Act 1967 (Qld). It was contended that the wording of s 50 is unambiguous. In short, Judge Chowdhury DCJ was said to have erred in concluding that section 50 did not exclude the discretion to impose a probation order.

It was suggested that the reasoning of Bowskill J, in the decision of The Queen v DS [2019] QSC 288 applied to the instant offence. The appeal in DS related to s 50B(1)(e) of the Weapons Act (Unlawfully supplying a category H weapon to a person, being a short firearm, and having no reasonable excuse for doing so). The Court in Broederlow held that the reasoning applied equally to the possession of a weapon offence as much as the supply of weapons.

Decision

Morrission JA with whom Sofronoff P and Mullins JA agreed, found that section 50 is clear and unambiguous. In short there is no power to impose a penalty other than the minimum term to be wholly served in a corrective services facility. His Honour had regard to the following factors:

  1. the text of the provision makes it clear that the offences to which the mandatory minimum penalty apply are a specific classification within the general offences of unlawful possession. s 50(1)(d) picks out specific subdivisions of offences, identified specifically by their characteristics.
  2. the way in which the provision specifies the penalty is, in my view, entirely unambiguous. It requires the period of imprisonment to be served “wholly in a corrective services facility”. Those very clear words exclude serving a penalty outside a corrective services facility. A probation order is just such a penalty.
  3. ss 50(1)(a)-(c) all provide for a maximum penalty depending on the circumstances. Properly construed in accordance with s 41 of the Acts Interpretation Act, that is taken to mean that the offence is punishable by a penalty not more than the maximum.
  4. the context in which ss 50(1)(d) and (e) are found can be determined by reference, in part, to the extrinsic material.

… s 50(1)(d)(iii) provides no opportunity to exercise a discretion, but mandates the imposition of the minimum penalty. Thus, if this Court reached the conclusion, as I have, that s 50(1)(d)(iii) was unambiguous in its terms and compelled the imposition of that minimum penalty, the terms of the statute exclude any residual discretion.

Commissioner of Police v Broederlow [2020] QCA 161 at 40

When considering the Courts residual discretion the Court was persuaded that Broederlow had performed well on Probation. However, the Court determined that there was no power to impose a sentence other than imprisonment.

That conclusion highlights the unsatisfactory nature, from a sentencing discretion point of view, of statutes which impose mandatory minimum sentences. Effectively it means that an offender is subject to that mandatory minimum no matter what the circumstances of the offending and no matter how compelling the mitigating factors might be. This case is an example of that. The evidence adduced shows the respondent’s positive performance whilst on probation since his release from custody. Whatever the merits of that mitigating factor, s 50(1)(d)(iii) prevents the Court from giving appropriate recognition to it.

Commissioner of Police v Broederlow [2020] QCA 161 at 42

What does this mean for the Evade Police Charge?

The Court referred to the decision of Henry J in Commissioner of Police Service v Spencer. Without deciding the issue the Court held that the wording of s 754 is well removed from that in ss 50(1)(d) and (e).

Disclaimer

This website contains general information about legal matters.  The information is not advice, and should not be treated as such.  You must not rely on the information on this website as an alternative to legal advice from your lawyer or other professional legal services provider. This publication is for your information and interest only. You should never delay seeking legal advice, disregard legal advice, or commence or discontinue any legal action because of information on this website.

The receipt of any information from us in this publication is not intended to create nor does it create a solicitor-client relationship between you and Gatenby Criminal Lawyers Pty Ltd.

For specific legal advice you should immediately contact Gatenby Criminal Lawyers on (07) 5580 0120.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

Can the police search my car at a Random Breath Test? Explosive Cross Examination By Gatenby

Related Posts

Uncategorized

New Supreme Court Judges Appointed.

Case Notes

Case Notes, Comparative Sentences, Penalties

Case Note – Parole Delay on Sentences.

Case Notes

Case Notes, Penalties

Case Note – Impact of Parole Delay on Sentences.

Contact Details

Office: (07) 5580 0120
Fax: (07) 5580 0952
Michael Gatenby: 0457 999 022

Demi Quadrio: 0477 800 620
Ashleigh Smith: 0477 800 421
Patricija Nedjelko: 0477 800 880

Gatenby Law
Copyright © 2019 Gatenby Criminal Lawyers, All Rights Reserved

News

  • Case NotesLegal professional privilege
  • New Supreme Court Judges Appointed.
  • Case NotesCase Note Update- Pre-sentence custody declaration.

Southport

Suite 6, Level 2
Excalibur House
52 Davenport St
Southport Qld 4215

Coomera

Suite 3, East Wing
Fortune Place
2 Fortune Street
Coomera Qld 4209

Postal

PO Box 1672
Southport BC 4215